Tuesday, August 16, 2005

Interesting article on John Roberts' upcoming confirmation "battle" (although it looks like less and less of a battle to me) to the Supreme Court from Joe at AMERICAblog:
We still don't know a lot about John Roberts. And, the White House won't give all the information that the Senate Democrats want. Think about this. They did release info that says Roberts is against equal pay for equal work and the he refers to "the abortion tragedy."

What else is the Bush White House withholding?
First of all, the fact that the White House isn't releasing all the information it has, or at least the information that has been requested by the Senators, should be grounds for a fierce battle and protracted stonewalling untill the documents are released.

Second, I read that the White House is releasing its info about Roberts very slowly, and only after it has itself sifted through it very carefully, in order to avoid any negative information from being released. All to avoid giving ammunition to the Democrats, like a couple weeks ago when it was discovered that Roberts had done pro bono work for a gay organization, helping it to win a landmark Supreme Court case.

Now, the information released so far is, in my view, not very promising of a mainstream judge, which makes me ponder, what kind of more damaging and explosive information is the White House witholding from the public? And, will it see the light of day before the confirmation procedings are over?

Don't count on it.

3 comments:

CGrim said...

It's called "seperation of powers." The Senate can no more demand documents from the White House than the White House can demand documents from the Senate.

Constitutionally, none of the branches of government are obliged to provide any documents to any other branch. The Congress should be happy they got as much as they did.

Checks and balances, baby.

Massimo said...

Ok, maybe legally the White House isn't bound to release any documents, but what about morally and ethically?

Isn't this the guy who wanted to go to the White House to restore honesty and morality to the institution of the Presidency? Does he think hiding and withholding information when it's requested is morally right? Or honest?

I think not.

You know how I see this? I see it as Bush is trying to hide something that might damage the image of his candidate.

Aren't Republicans the ones that say, if you've got nothing to hide, than why worry?

Release all the documents, and if there is nothing bad or wrong about Roberts, we'll be happy to give you an up or down vote.

Ray said...

The White House is not obligated to release any and all documents to Congress simply because they asked. That's true enough.

However, it IS obligated to release non-confidential documents to the public. Those are the documents Congress is looking for. Non classified information. You and I should be able to ask for them (under the Freedom of Information Act) and get access.

So, if Congress asked for copies of the (classified) Presidential Daily Briefings, they shouldn't get them. But if they ask for documents relating to the work Roberts did as an attorney representing the American People, it's well within their rights. And the White House has an duty to release them.